Featured image for The compound effect of AI transformation
AI AgentsStrategyBusinessAI

The compound effect of AI transformation

5 min read
Alexander Ekdahl & Jens Eriksvik
Team Members

This article explains why AI transformation is a compound effect, not a linear process, and argues that agent-based AI can bridge silos and unlock value through experimentation.

The compound effect of AI transformation

0:000:00

AI transformation is rarely a clean, linear roadmap. It’s more like a domino chain of discovery, one initiative sparks another, lessons in one function unlock new potential in another. The real shift happens when organizations stop treating AI as isolated proof-of-concepts and start treating it as a connected journey across the enterprise. This is where agentic AI becomes a catalyst, not just a capability.

Businesses that once viewed AI as a departmental experiment are now realizing something bigger: every success story, an automated claims system, an intelligent assistant, a predictive maintenance engine, leaves behind assets, insights, and behaviors that compound. Transformation is not a destination, it’s an evolving network of digital colleagues learning, scaling, and improving together. One of our clients said; “our first agent paid for itself, but the second one made the whole company faster.”

Why this compounding matters now

The age of standalone AI pilots is over. Leaders are waking up to the idea that real value comes when AI flows between processes, not when it’s boxed into them. A conversational AI in customer service can spark data-sharing ideas for HR. Predictive analytics in logistics can inspire proactive maintenance in production. Momentum becomes the new strategy.

Right now, most enterprises face a familiar pattern:

  • Fragmented AI pilots that don’t talk to each other.
  • Innovation fatigue caused by siloed ownership.
  • Unclear accountability for scaling success.
  • Missed synergies between internal and external initiatives.

As AI agents become more autonomous and interconnected, they make these silos look increasingly absurd. Agentic AI turns every initiative into fuel for the next, not another isolated success story but a shared foundation that compounds learning and capability across the enterprise. Another client said; “our AI projects stopped being projects when we let them talk to each other.”

From pilots to a connected AI fabric

The old model of digital transformation followed a predictable script: pick a process, optimize it, report the ROI, and move on. It made sense when we used old school tech and AI was narrow and expensive. But in today’s agentic era, every agent you deploy is both a solution and a sensor, feeding back data and insight that can unlock value elsewhere.

Profile photo of Alexander Ekdahl
Everyone wants perfect data before they start. That’s like waiting for the ocean to go still before learning to swim. The truth is, agentic AI works with what you already have; the mess, the silos, the incompatible systems. The agents learn the quirks, build the bridges, and suddenly the old integration problem starts solving itself. The biggest blocker isn’t the data, it’s the mindset that says we can’t move until it’s clean.
Alexander Ekdahl
CTO

Most AI transformations stall not because of algorithms, but because of data anxiety. Teams are told to “fix the data first,” which usually means months of schema mapping, integration projects, and endless governance meetings. The irony is that modern AI agents don’t need perfect data, they learn to navigate imperfection. One of our clients said, "we spent two years cleaning data and three weeks watching an agent make sense of it anyway.”

Article image

The beauty of today’s agents is that they can operate on messy, heterogeneous data as-is. Instead of enforcing a grand data model, they learn to interpret, translate, and connect across silos, Salesforce here, SAP there, spreadsheets somewhere in between. One agent’s task is to create value; its byproduct is practical interoperability.

  • Agents can reason across multiple systems without rigid integrations.
  • They create “living bridges” between platforms rather than static pipelines.
  • Each deployment reduces friction for the next, compounding value.
  • Connections emerge through use, not through design committees.

This flips the traditional integration problem on its head. The new rule is not “fix your data first, then integrate” but “deploy agents that make your existing data useful.” LLMs now act as the adaptive translation layer that used to demand massive ETL projects and middleware investments. Another client said, "we didn’t need a new data warehouse, we needed an agent that could think across them.”

The real barrier isn’t technical anymore, it’s organizational. The question is no longer “When will our data be ready for AI?” It’s “When will we let AI make our data ready for us?”

Building momentum through experimentation

Successful AI journeys don’t start with grand strategies, they start with motion. The secret is to design transformation as a series of connected experiments, each one feeding the next. This is how enterprises move from sporadic innovation to systemic change.

  • Create visible pathways for cross-domain reuse of AI components.
  • Measure and reward shared learnings, not isolated success metrics.
  • Use agentic frameworks that enable AI agents to learn from each other.
  • Anchor every initiative in human-AI rebalancing, not just automation.

Momentum is what replaces the traditional transformation roadmap. Each agent doesn’t just solve a problem, it teaches the next one how to solve it faster. One of our clients said, "after deploying three agents, we stopped talking about AI use cases and started talking about workflows.” The compound effect is real: every digital colleague makes the next easier to deploy.

What enterprises should do now

Stop treating AI like a project spreadsheet, treat it like compound interest. Your goal is not to finish AI, it is to spin up a network of digital colleagues that make each other smarter and make your people faster. Start where the mess is, then let agents learn in public. One of our clients said, "we got more value from week two of usage than month six of planning.”

Do four things, ruthlessly:

  • Pick two connected use cases, customer to ops is a good pairing, and ship within 30 days.
  • Stand up a lightweight bridge, data, access, guardrails, so agents can cross teams without a ticket queue.
  • Build capabilities and skills, measure reuse, not vanity ROI, count patterns, prompts, connectors, policies that the next agent inherits.

The compounding starts when agents talk to each other, not when slides talk to each other. Another client said, "once the agents started sharing what they learned, the roadmap wrote itself.”